Press Release | IGB | 09-12-2011

Traffic rules of shoaling fish

With the help of high resolution slow-motion cameras scientists discovered how fishes coordinate their movements while swimming in a shoal. They estimate the distance to neighbouring individuals and come closer or back off intuitively.

Traffic rules of shoaling fish

Synchronised movements are only possible, when fishes adhere to basic "traffic rules". | Photo: Fotolia, Severine

 

With the help of high resolution slow-motion

cameras scientists discovered how fishes coordinate their movements while

swimming in a shoal. They estimate the distance to neighbouring individuals and

come closer or back off intuitively. Mosquitofish only need to observe one

nearest neighbour.

It’s

estimated that about 60 percent of all fish species form groups of individuals

at some point in their lives. This behaviour is advantageous in many respects,

for example they find food more easily or defend more efficiently when attacked

by predators. That movements appear synchronised in a school of fish is not

self-evident, says Ashley Ward (Leibniz-Institute for Freshwater Ecology and

Inland Fisheries, IGB). Together with colleagues from Sweden and Australia,

Ward analysed the movements of mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) and identified

interaction rules that determine how they respond to their neighbour’s

movements and positions. “We found out that the individuals have three kinds of

zones that they respond to. First there is the zone of repulsion, where a fish

backs away when it comes closer to another fish. Second there is the zone of

alignment, where they have the ideal distance to other individuals. And third

there is the zone of attraction, where the individual is inclined to reach the

zone of alignment and comes closer.”

Vorschaubild Video FischeWard and

his colleagues formulated three basic rules: Attraction is important in

maintaining the group cohesion and works like a virtual rubber band that keeps

the shoal from breaking up. Repulsion is an individual impulse and is mediated

principally by changes in speed. As the third rule the scientists observed,

that mosquitofish only respond to their single nearest neighbour, although the

directions and positions of all shoal members are highly correlated. This

behaviour is different from pigeons for example. It has been proved that pigeons

are able to respond to up to seven other individuals at the same time.

When a

shoal is moving, there is a lead individual, while all other shoal members try

so swim in the zone of alignment. To locate other individuals, fishes mostly

use visual contact and mechanical reception through their lateral lines. ”Each

fish is only to react with a delay, when a neighbour changes speed or

direction”, explains Ward. “Movement impulses are therefore transmitted in the

form of a longitudinal wave, there are always fish that come too close or loose

contact to the group.” These waves are almost invisible for the human eye; the

scientists were only able to verify them with the help of high resolution

slow-motion cameras. “The courses of action are basically the same as in heavy

traffic. Drivers pay attention to the safety distance and need to slow down or

speed up in order to keep it.”

This basic

concept was hard to identify for the researchers. Only recently have computers

programmes been capable of tracking multiple similarly looking agents over time

in a video. The movement analysis was still tricky, Ward reports. Although

tracking methods work excellent nowadays, the software cannot replace common

sense. When two fish were crossing over in the viewing axis of the camera, the

software could not figure out which was which. Every time this happened, the

movements had to be assisted manually. Evaluating the videos of the small tank

with 2 to 16 mosquitofish took about eight months. The scientists assume that

the identified rules can be applied not only to other fish species, but to other

group-living vertebrates and mammals as well.

Originally

published in PNAS on November 15, 2011, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109355108